Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01632
Original file (BC 2012 01632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01632 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect his service time in Korea and 
he be awarded any decorations he is eligible to receive for this 
service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was assigned temporary duty (TDY) to Camp Sill, Korea, on 
three (3) separate occasions; however, this is not indicated on 
his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge. According to his Congressman, the Air 
Force has no record of this service. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force. The 
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer 
or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 11 May 1971, 
separation reflects 1 years, 1 month and 27 days of foreign 
service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states a thorough review of 
the applicant’s Master Personnel Records (MPR) failed to 
substantiate his claim of Foreign Service in Korea. The 
applicant provided a copy of a travel order directing his TDY to 
Camp Sill, Osan, Korea; however, no source documents were 
provided, i.e., travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of 
evaluation, decorations or other official military documents, 
that reflect travel was completed and the inclusive periods of 
the travel. 

 


The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 8 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. However, if the 
applicant provides a copy of the source document(s) mentioned by 
AFPC/DPAPP, we will reconsider his request. In the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 26 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2120-01632: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 15 Jun 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Aug 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01323

    Original file (BC-2011-01323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was mailed to the applicant on 30 September 2011, for review and comments within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04864

    Original file (BC 2013 04864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the applicant’s submission of TDY Order T-408, dated, 28 January 1968, indicating his TDY permanent duty station at APO SF 96264 (Kusan Air Base, Korea), we believe he has provided sufficient evidence to establish that he had “boots-on-the-ground” in both the RVN and Korea. However, neither of the source documents provided confirm the exact dates the applicant served in the RVN or Korea. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03721

    Original file (BC-2006-03721.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation showing he was assigned or TDY to Korea. There is no documentation in the applicant’s military records to reflect he was assigned or TDY to Korea.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02383

    Original file (BC-2012-02383.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02383 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. In this respect, we note there was no entry on the DD Form 214, issued at the time of his 1973...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04204

    Original file (BC-2010-04204.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04204 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his service in Vietnam. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from his military personnel records. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00665

    Original file (BC-2011-00665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00665 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFPC has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for his service with the 303rd MMS, Kunsan AB, Korea, as well as entitlement to the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) for his honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279

    Original file (BC-2012-01279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, it does not reflect the entire time he was TDY in Korea. The applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ 3 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012 and 3 Oct 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02609

    Original file (BC-2012-02609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States – Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his service time in Vietnam or Thailand. Although he has been unable to provide copies of the travel vouchers for these TDYs, in view of the fact the foreign service documented on his DD Form 214 exceeds his tour length in Taiwan, as confirmed by the OPR, by 3 months and 21 days, we find the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02413

    Original file (BC-2012-02413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 2 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He asserts that he traveled to various locations in Korea, Vietnam and Japan. Should the applicant provide documentation that establishes he served in Vietnam or Japan, we would be willing to reconsider his request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01395

    Original file (BC-2007-01395.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01395 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1966. There are no documents in his records that support his claim that he was TDY to Vietnam. In applicant’s...